Manela, Motions in Limine: On the Threshold of Evidentiary Strategy 2 (2003). In addition to the federal courts, courts in at least 46 states accept motions in limine. Graham Jr., Federal Practice and Procedure § 5037.10 (2005). 104(a), 103(c) (authorizing courts to control pretrial proceedings and resolve preliminary questions of evidence) 21 Charles Alan Wright & Kenneth W. Additional guidance is found in the rules of procedure. The authority permitting motions in limine generally stems from a court’s discretionary power to control trial proceedings. In other words, the true purpose of a motion in limine is simply to obtain a pretrial ruling on evidentiary disputes to “narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.” Bradley v. See Cassell’s Latin Dictionary 319 (1957). But the phrase “in limine” actually derives from the Latin word “ limen,” meaning “at the threshold”-describing a motion to be filed at the threshold of trial. In fact, when asked, many attorneys will describe a motion in limine as a motion specifically designed to preclude or limit certain evidence from being admitted at trial. It is a common misconception that the phrase “in limine” means “to limit.” See, e.g., Motions in Limine, OpenArgsWiki. BryanAGarner (editor in chief, Black’s Law Dictionary), Twitter (Jan. Leading authority on the topic states that the phrase “in limine” has been fully anglicized and thus is no longer is italicized.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |